Earth Sciences Forum Forum Index Earth Sciences Forum
This site is dedicated to the Earth Sciences. We are here for you to discuss issues regarding any aspect of the Earth sciences, at all levels of knowledge. Questions are welcomed, as are open scientific debates. Enjoy!!!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


A better definition for the kilogram? Scientists propose a p

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Earth Sciences Forum Forum Index -> Other Sciences
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
scpg02



Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 221
Location: Sacramento

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 2:15 am    Post subject: A better definition for the kilogram? Scientists propose a p Reply with quote

Contact: John Toon
jtoon@gatech.edu
404-894-6986
Georgia Institute of Technology Research News

A better definition for the kilogram? Scientists propose a precise number of carbon atoms

Quote:
How much is a kilogram?

It turns out that nobody can say for sure, at least not in a way that won’t change ever so slightly over time. The official kilogram – a cylinder cast 118 years ago from platinum and iridium and known as the International Prototype Kilogram or “Le Gran K” – has been losing mass, about 50 micrograms at last check. The change is occurring despite careful storage at a facility near Paris.

That’s not so good for a standard the world depends on to define mass.

Now, two U.S. professors – a physicist and mathematician – say it’s time to define the kilogram in a new and more elegant way that will be the same today, tomorrow and 118 years from now. They’ve launched a campaign aimed at redefining the kilogram as the mass of a very large – but precisely-specified – number of carbon-12 atoms.


http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-09/giot-abd092107.php



_________________
Corner Cafe
for relaxing adult conversation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Andre



Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 298
Location: Germany - The Nederlands

PostPosted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Maggie, it used to be the mass of one liter of water at a certain temperature. Problem of course in what ratio of heavy isotopes.



_________________
Moderator of http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/climatesceptics/

"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."

Charley Brown
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Earth Sciences Forum Forum Index -> Other Sciences All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
WoW Gold|Gavin Newsom|Free Anonymous Surfing