| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Qwiftly
Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 13
Location: Sweden
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:01 pm Post subject: Ultimate proof of eternal gain. |
 |
|
1.Everything that exists is objects
2.*Every objects time increase
3.Time is objects*
4.Increase is gain
5.All will gain all and become one
_________________
Experience is made of +things and it cannot diverge, cause then your not experiencing.
I would like to make the most efficient gain chain reaction for all, it would even be fair. You cannot resist me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andre
Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 291
Location: Germany - The Nederlands
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Could you be a bit more specific?
_________________
Moderator of http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/climatesceptics/
"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."
Charley Brown |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Qwiftly
Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 13
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Andre wrote: | | Could you be a bit more specific? |
1. All existing is '+' objects
2.*All objects time increase
3.Time is objects*
4.Increase is gain
So all unify & gain all
6.A neuron exp no others change 7.The mind & universe are pictures
Pain and despare, determination, happiness, sickness and dexterity.
all is joy.
_________________
Experience is made of +things and it cannot diverge, cause then your not experiencing.
I would like to make the most efficient gain chain reaction for all, it would even be fair. You cannot resist me.
Last edited by Qwiftly on Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:55 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Qwiftly
Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 13
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Andre wrote: | | Could you be a bit more specific? |
Why is this this topic moved into the tar pit, it is a proof, you cannot refute it, without pointing out the flaw.
_________________
Experience is made of +things and it cannot diverge, cause then your not experiencing.
I would like to make the most efficient gain chain reaction for all, it would even be fair. You cannot resist me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mk
Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Qwiftly wrote: | | Why is this this topic moved into the tar pit, it is a proof, |
Probably because it's too New Age and unscientific thrown into a pool of scientists.
| Quote: | | you cannot refute it, without pointing out the flaw. |
| Quote: | | Quote: | 2.*Every objects time increase
3.Time is objects*
4.Increase is gain |
|
Here you're saying that age is equal to increasing or gaining in a closed system. I tend to interpret this as increasing in mass or energy, which is opposite the commonly referred to First Law of Thermodynamics. Objects or ideas with a spiritual nature and the similar are unrecognized scientifically.
Last edited by Mk on Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:20 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
billiards
Site Admin
Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 79
Location: London, UK
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Qwiftly wrote: | | Andre wrote: | | Could you be a bit more specific? |
Why is this this topic moved into the tar pit, it is a proof, you cannot refute it, without pointing out the flaw. |
I moved it, sorry should have said something. It's not really the kind of thing this site is here for, even in discussion, but I will tolerate it here in the Tar Pit.
What is it a proof of? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Qwiftly
Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 13
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| billiards wrote: | | Qwiftly wrote: | | Andre wrote: | | Could you be a bit more specific? |
Why is this this topic moved into the tar pit, it is a proof, you cannot refute it, without pointing out the flaw. |
I moved it, sorry should have said something. It's not really the kind of thing this site is here for, even in discussion, but I will tolerate it here in the Tar Pit.
What is it a proof of? |
Thank you for your reply!
Did-n't know that general discussion was only science and serials at that period of time.
To answer your question, for timeflow to be, a +object (you can't have -1 apples in your hand) must be added to the +object with the timeflow in question
It can all be explained with this loop:
1.All +objects experience summate, experience is +objects(1.)
If that loop is an explanation, what is your counter argument? For instance can you change the bold + into -
_________________
Experience is made of +things and it cannot diverge, cause then your not experiencing.
I would like to make the most efficient gain chain reaction for all, it would even be fair. You cannot resist me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mk
Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 18
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm not understanding any of this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Qwiftly
Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 13
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mk wrote: | | I'm not understanding any of this. |
All +objects experience summate, experience is +objects. All +objects experience summate, experience is +objects. All +objects experience summate, experience is +objects...
Let's try replacing summate with diverge.
All +objects experience diverge, experience is +objects. All +objects experience diverge, experience is +objects. All +objects experience diverge, experience is +objects.
At first that would also look perfectly logical, but if experience diverge, then you are not experiencing.
For further information, see my signature.
_________________
Experience is made of +things and it cannot diverge, cause then your not experiencing.
I would like to make the most efficient gain chain reaction for all, it would even be fair. You cannot resist me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pythagorean
Joined: 13 Aug 2007
Posts: 7
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GraBeTH THy BaTTleGeaR, I SmeLL TroLL SHiTE |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scpg02
Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 221
Location: Sacramento
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Oooo first body in the tar pit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Qwiftly
Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Posts: 13
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Mk wrote: | | First Law of Thermodynamics. |
Who said that it needs to be broken? experiencing is to melt together, is gaining. There's no breaking rules here, the particles just melt together into higherdimensional particles. That is experience. Don't forget the higgsbosons.
_________________
Experience is made of +things and it cannot diverge, cause then your not experiencing.
I would like to make the most efficient gain chain reaction for all, it would even be fair. You cannot resist me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sunsettommy
Joined: 09 Dec 2007
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Qwiftly wrote: | | Andre wrote: | | Could you be a bit more specific? |
Why is this this topic moved into the tar pit, it is a proof, you cannot refute it, without pointing out the flaw. |
It is hard to try refuting statements that are not understood at all.
The flaw may be in the lack of details in your postings.
What are you trying to postulate? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Join! (free) 
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
