Archive for Earth Sciences Forum This site is dedicated to the Earth Sciences. We are here for you to discuss issues regarding any aspect of the Earth sciences, at all levels of knowledge. Questions are welcomed, as are open scientific debates. Enjoy!!!
|

billiards
|
Exam QuestionHi people! Back from my holidays in Barcelona and Leeds, had a fantastic time, hope you didn't miss me too much
Was tidying my desk and stumbled across an exam paper I took last year, there's one question (that I chose not to do in the exam) that I think is quite interesting - so I will share it here and would love to see some answers/comments.
| Quote: |
A neswpaper recently claimed that the effect of heat released by fuel burning was being ignored in global warming predictions. Investigate this claim by determining the time taken for a small increase deltaT in temperature of the atmospheric column to radiate to space. By treating the atmosphere as a column of density p and thickness h, show that its temperature T satisfies
dT/dt=-sigma.T4/cpph
Use this equation to determine the time taken for the atmosphere to equilibrate. Comment on your answer.
Stefan's constant, sigma=5.7*10-8 J m-2 K-1 s-1
Specific heat of air, cp=1005 J kg-1 K-1
Density of air at 273 K = 1.3 kg m -3
|
|
scpg02
|
You were gone?
|
sneez
|
| Quote: | A neswpaper recently claimed that the effect of heat released by fuel burning was being ignored in global warming predictions. Investigate this claim by determining the time taken for a small increase deltaT in temperature of the atmospheric column to radiate to space. By treating the atmosphere as a column of density p and thickness h, show that its temperature T satisfies
dT/dt=-sigma.T4/cpph
Use this equation to determine the time taken for the atmosphere to equilibrate. Comment on your answer.
Stefan's constant, sigma=5.7*10-8 J m-2 K-1 s-1
Specific heat of air, cp=1005 J kg-1 K-1
Density of air at 273 K = 1.3 kg m -3
|
dQ/dt = emissivity*sigma*area*T^4 ------>radiative heating
dQ= m*cp*dT ----->definition of specific heat (m=mass)
V=m/rho ------>relationship between mass and density
let V= A*h -area time hight => m=A*h*rho
then:
dT/dt = [ emissivity*sigma*area*T^4 ] / [m* cp]
hence: dT/dt = [ emissivity*sigmaT^4 ] / [h*rho*cp] ------->the areas divide out
Integrating we would get time inverselly proportional to Temp. Thats quite interesting, so let me hear if I made a mistake here.
|
Andre
|
here is the empirical outcome:
http://www.knmi.nl/~laatdej/2006joc1292.pdf
| Quote: | ...We confirm the presence of a temperature change–industrialization correlation by analyzing the data with an additional statistical method and further confirm the absence of the above correlation in climate model simulations of enhanced GHG warming. Our findings thus provide an important test of climate model performance on regional scales.
These findings suggest that over the last two decades non-GHG anthropogenic processes have also contributed significantly to surface temperature changes. We identify one process that potentially could contribute to the observed temperature patterns, although there certainly may be other processes involve... |
|
Derek
|
Hi All,
I just knew there was a reason why I did not become a scientist.....
To answer the exam questions means spouting and "proving" AGW rubbish.
What happened to the idea that the earth can loose 5 times more heat than we and it can generate / recieve.
It's like trying to prove a flea deciedes which direction the dog goes in.
In would have to be an enourmous, totally unrealistic flea wouldn't it.
A flea called "an IPCC approved climate model" no doubt...
|
scpg02
|
| Derek wrote: |
A flea called "an IPCC approved climate model" no doubt...  |
Sucking the blood of the tax payer.
|
|
|
|