 |
Earth Sciences Forum This site is dedicated to the Earth Sciences. We are here for you to discuss issues regarding any aspect of the Earth sciences, at all levels of knowledge. Questions are welcomed, as are open scientific debates. Enjoy!!!
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
scpg02

Joined: 22 Jul 2007 Posts: 221 Location: Sacramento
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:12 pm Post subject: Thriving Hybrid Salamanders Contradict Common Wisdom |
|
|
Thriving Hybrid Salamanders Contradict Common Wisdom
September 25, 2007
| Quote: | A new UC Davis study not only has important findings for the future of California tiger salamanders, but also contradicts prevailing scientific thought about what happens when animal species interbreed.
The study, by former UC Davis doctoral student Benjamin Fitzpatrick (now on the faculty of University of Tennessee, Knoxville) and professor Bradley Shaffer, was published recently in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences' online edition.
The salamander experts studied the survival rates and genetic makeup of three types of salamanders: native California tiger salamanders (Ambystoma californiense), which are protected under the U.S. Endangered Species Act; barred tiger salamanders that were introduced in California from Texas in the 1950s (Ambystoma tigrinum mavortium); and the hybrid offspring born when the two species mated.
They found that more of the hybrid young survived in the wild than did young of the native or the introduced species -- quite a surprise, since animal hybrids are usually less fit than their parents ("hybrid vigor" is largely limited to plant crosses). |
http://www-news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=8316
_________________
Corner Cafe
for relaxing adult conversation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andre

Joined: 21 Jul 2007 Posts: 298 Location: Germany - The Nederlands
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If that is so, then it should be the same species.
This is the Californian animal
and the Texan tiger:
So if species get geographically divided, they may evolve differently further on but long as breeding produces fertile offspring, then I think by definition it's the same species. It's not the looks that determines species.
These are the same species too:
and
 _________________ Moderator of http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/climatesceptics/
"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."
Charley Brown |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scpg02

Joined: 22 Jul 2007 Posts: 221 Location: Sacramento
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LOL!
Out here in CA they try and make them two different ones so that they can restrict land and water use. It's not about the environment, it's about government control. _________________
Corner Cafe
for relaxing adult conversation |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Baywax

Joined: 23 Jul 2007 Posts: 113 Location: Pacific West Coast
|
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Higher survival and reproduction rates in a hybrid species may not be an
indication of species survivability. There's a lot to be said for naturally
occuring population control in a species. This is something that, every day,
humans fight against with hosptials and numerous excercises in sounding
alarms about diseases and so on.
Funny enough, the stress that is the result of all the alarms is causing more
deaths via stress disorders such as heart attachs, suicide and wars. So,
naturally occuring population control seems to be pretty hard to shake.
_________________ Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence; he is just using his memory. Leonardo Da Vinci
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.
W.C. Fields |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|