 |
Earth Sciences Forum This site is dedicated to the Earth Sciences. We are here for you to discuss issues regarding any aspect of the Earth sciences, at all levels of knowledge. Questions are welcomed, as are open scientific debates. Enjoy!!!
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Qwiftly
Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Posts: 13 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 11:07 am Post subject: Nuclear waste capsuled in copper, freezed to -260C |
|
|
It decayed faster, any comments on how this is possible, caused by atomic structure you figure? Some unknown force? Perhaps one should simulate some unradioactive substance, that, when radioactive, fast decays in the radioactive substance? so what substance has got the fastest halvation time?.
Can this all be caused by some chaotic yet ordered electron movement, that can be simulated in some other, cheap substance, for instance through a computer that varies a magnetic field or electrostatic field in the substance? Or that a certain special metal alloy is especially susceptive to magnetic fields and reacts so indifferent yet chaotic to variations in it, that it is theoretically possible to create the "chaotic" or advanced structured movement that tend to release neutrons, in a much faster speed then before with the proper machine.
BTW. It's just waste handling, it's not nuclear science until we call it that.
And i thought it had something to do with molecule structures etc., I thought this is not physics. Well partly. All things are physics.
_________________ Experience is made of +things and it cannot diverge, cause then your not experiencing.
I would like to make the most efficient gain chain reaction for all, it would even be fair. You cannot resist me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
billiards Site Admin

Joined: 21 Jul 2007 Posts: 81 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Qwiftly, this looks like nuclear physics to me... furthermore, it would be nice if you could list a reference to where you heard about this, just so we know you're not making it up.
Personally I see no benefit in speeding up nuclear decay in radioactive waste unless you can contain the waste safely whilst it decays and then you will be left of fairly harmless low-level waste. I personally was not aware that changes in temperature could induce changes in half-life, although I believe there are a few exceptions that have been studied (I can't remember off the top of my head what they are). I'm wondering if the supercooling of copper actually turns the copper into a superconductor, if so, then no magnetic field can permeate through the copper shielding, so varying an external magnetic field would have no effect whatsoever on what's going on inside the casing. Of course, it would be pretty damn hard to keep the casing in tact with all that decay going on inside, let alone keeping it at -260 C with all that radiogenic heating! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bystander
Joined: 23 Jul 2007 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
EC is slightly dependent upon conditions (no electrons around, no electron capture). Count a sample in the open for alpha, beta, and gamma, then encapsulate it in copper and count gamma only? "Gee, the activity is way down --- wire Stockholm!"
It's flim-flam. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Qwiftly
Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Posts: 13 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I found it in "Illustrerad Vetenskap". Claus Rolf of the university of Bochum made the conclusion.
Practically it became 10% faster, the decay. The radioactive substance was polonium-210. They are gonna use purer copper next time.
And I hear you on that magnetic field being difficult to vary. But the 10 degree F heat might carry just the right magnetic field in the photons. If we could now only judge what frequency of light should pierce it. Imagine: a small laser beam, that makes holes in the valence electrons. it could make is decay faster. Given that the electron magnetic fields where synched. Honestly, that in it self is not so much sci-fi.
Can we try atleast that, some day, ey?
Though I agree, it might be nuclear science
For you who need a link, I can only find a norwegian:
http://www.forskning.no/Artikler/2006/oktober/1161778442.64
And a french (sorry, I forgot):
http://www.alterbusinessnews.be/fr/article.php?art=15940 _________________ Experience is made of +things and it cannot diverge, cause then your not experiencing.
I would like to make the most efficient gain chain reaction for all, it would even be fair. You cannot resist me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Baywax

Joined: 23 Jul 2007 Posts: 113 Location: Pacific West Coast
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Once rocket science is perfected, if its not already, just shoot the Nuk Waste into the sun.
_________________ Anyone who conducts an argument by appealing to authority is not using his intelligence; he is just using his memory. Leonardo Da Vinci
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.
W.C. Fields |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|