Earth Sciences Forum Forum Index Earth Sciences Forum
This site is dedicated to the Earth Sciences. We are here for you to discuss issues regarding any aspect of the Earth sciences, at all levels of knowledge. Questions are welcomed, as are open scientific debates. Enjoy!!!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Exhibit #1 The Younger Dryas and the Meerfelder maar

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Earth Sciences Forum Forum Index -> Atmosphere, Ocean, and Climate -> Younger Dryas Exhibits
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Andre



Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 298
Location: Germany - The Nederlands

PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:55 am    Post subject: Exhibit #1 The Younger Dryas and the Meerfelder maar Reply with quote

The objective of the "Exhibit-#n-The-Younger-Dryas-and .......,"-threads is to investigate
for ourselfs what evidence is available to judge about the alleged cold conditions of the Younger Dryas.

This is the first one, one of my favorites (albeit not even the most compelling), the Meerfelder maar:



It's an old crater lake in the Volcanic Eifel in Germany. The Eifel area has been active during the last
glacial transition like many other areas. Due to the moist soils, volcanism here is thought to be
explosive due to the water explosive evaporating, leaving deep craters, which fill up with water, the
"maars". There are dozen of them, containing a marvellous record of geologic history in their muddy
sediments.

In those static waters sediments accumulate slowly. In dry periods, wind- blown dust settles on the
bottom (facies). In spring there usually a short bloom period of algae and other micro-organisms
(diatoms), the remains of which show a tiny white layer on the bottom. But on top of that there are pollen in summer,
which don’t decay for some reason. So you get separate layers accumulating for each season and as
long as nothing disturbs this annual “stratification”, you can count each individual year just like the ice
cores. Here is such a sediment core with the annual layers (varves)



The beauty of it is that what-you-see-is-what-you-get, unlike ice cores where you need interpreting
things with hypotheses and allow for all kind of “in situ” changes due to the dynamics of ice sheets.

Now after laborious work of the researches an inventory can be made of the annual pollen content of
such a core. Here is the Meerfelder maar in the Younger Dryas, a unique record:



Source:
Lücke, A. Brauer A., 2004. Biogeochemical and micro-facial fingerprints of ecosystem response to
rapid Late Glacial climatic changes in varved sediments of Meerfelder Maar (Germany).
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, Volume 211, Issues 1- 2, 19 August.

In the next part we will analyse what we see. Is it temperature or is it moisture?

See also
The Younger Dryas exhibits
Exhibit #1, The Younger Dryas and the Meerfelder maar
Exhibit #2, The Younger Dryas and Mediterranean region
Exhibit #3, The Younger Dryas and South greenland
Exhibit #4, The Younger Dryas and Glaciation
Exhibit #5, The Younger Dryas and the Mystery interval
Exhibit #6, The Younger Dryas and North America
Exhibit #7, The start of the Younger Dryas
Exhibit #8, The Younger Dryas and the Siberian Steppes



_________________
Moderator of http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/climatesceptics/

"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."

Charley Brown


Last edited by Andre on Tue Aug 21, 2007 7:20 pm; edited 6 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
billiards
Site Admin


Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 81
Location: London, UK

PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Andre, for those of us that don't know how to interpret this core data, what exactly is it telling us? I'd imagine that tree pollen going down in the Younger Drias is consistent with the number of trees declining, which is consistent with this cold spell in earth history. (c.f.climate diagrams on "mammoth thread".)

It will be fascinating to put this stuff up next to the ice core data from the same time and try to integrate it, has anybody to your knowledge done that yet?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Andre



Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 298
Location: Germany - The Nederlands

PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

billiards wrote:
Hi Andre, for those of us that don't know how to interpret this core
data, what exactly is it telling us? I'd imagine that tree pollen going down in the
Younger Drias is consistent with the number of trees declining, which is consistent with
this cold spell in earth history. (c.f.climate diagrams on "mammoth thread".)

It will be fascinating to put this stuff up next to the ice core data from the same time
and try to integrate it, has anybody to your knowledge done that yet?


Yes, Me Wink

Richard Muller of Berkeley, one of the very few inductive thinkers once said:
Quote:
If a conclusion is attractive, I'm temped to lower my standards

So, we see the Younger Dryas here, we *know* that this was a cold period, we see a
decline in trees and a decline in pollen count at the right side of the figure:



and bingo, we see a cold Younger Dryas, an *attractive* conclusion since it dovetales
nicely with or knowledge (or bias?) or?

Suppose, I was not to know the timeframe and I was to find out for myself what could
be said about temperature and humidity, I would first look at temperature sensitive taxa.
Oak, Quercus, for instance is a typically moderate warmth loving tree, you won't find
them in the mountains. Yet I see a tiny amount of oak pollen throughout the whole
period and most certainly not declining in the Younger Dryas.

I also see the moderate winter hardy great burnet (Sangisorba officinalis), which we
have already seen in the guts of the Yukagir Mammoth and we also see the genus
Helianthemum appearing in the Younger Dryas and disappearing afterwards. But
this genus is generally in arid/warm conditions. The decline of trees in favor of
"graminae" grasses and the decline of pollen is also consistent with aridness. Also the
thriving of aquaric plants Potamogeton (pondweed), Botrychium (ferns) and
Pediastrum (algae) would tell me that large parts of the lake were marshy, so there was
a distinct lake low level stand not seen before and after the period.

Of course I would also look for typical cold indicating taxa and species of the north, like
Dryas octopetala or Crowberry (Empetrum). But those are absent.
Actually the general mix of herbs then closely resembles the mix of the
present for that area.

So my *blind* unbiased conclusion would be that the Younger Dryas was definitely
arid and most certainly not colder than the periods before and after or perhaps even
nowadays.

Oops Rolling Eyes
_________________
Moderator of http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/climatesceptics/

"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."

Charley Brown
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Matt



Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 14

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

An interesting read. One thing isn't clear to me though: In the UK the younger dryas (aka. Loch Lomond stadial) is characterised by a small glacial readvance. This doesn't seem consistent with increased aridity and no decrease in temperature. Why would the glaciers grow if you were correct?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andre



Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 298
Location: Germany - The Nederlands

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matt wrote:
An interesting read. One thing isn't clear to me though: In the UK the younger dryas (aka. Loch Lomond stadial) is characterised by a small glacial readvance. This doesn't seem consistent with increased aridity and no decrease in temperature. Why would the glaciers grow if you were correct?


Matt, take a good look at the dating:

Quote:
This period of amphi-Atlantic climatic oscillation between 11,000 - 10,000 bp saw marked readvances in the S. & W. fringes of the Scandinavian ice sheet and there was renewed activity throughout the mountain regions of W. Europe.


Now remember the carbon dating conversion.
11,000 BP = 12910 Cal BP
10,000 BP = 11400 Cal BP but with a large error.

The Younger Dryas is about 12,700 - 11,600 hence both carbon dates are pre- and post Younger Dryas. Now look in the other Exibihits and this one, Younger Dryas arid, the preceding and following periods wet. Glaciers need snow to advance. And it snowed a lot just prior to the Younger Dryas and right after the Younger Dryas but in the Younger Dryas?

I plan aother thread, likely exhibit #4, zooming in on the alleged Younger Dryas glaciations.
_________________
Moderator of http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/climatesceptics/

"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."

Charley Brown
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bryn Thomas



Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I look forward to your story unfolding, but for the present still have difficulty with the inference you draw of a correlation between aridity and warmth.

Alow me to play devil's advocate.

The author of the wikipedia entry about the YD <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Younger_Dryas> notes:
"Other features seen include:
* More dust in the atmosphere, originating from deserts in Asia.
* Drought in the Levant, perhaps motivating the Natufian culture to invent agriculture."

But those are generalities, not necessarily applicable to the Eifel.

You are inferring from the greater abundance of grass pollen that the climate is drier, but the percentages of Pine and Birch are not insignificant. And the alga Pediastrum flourished well during at least the lower half of the YD. One has to be careful interpreting pollen diagrams. At any one horizon the percentages of all groups of pollen add up to 100. The apparent reduction in Pine and Birch is perhaps due to the addition of a herbaceous component, not a reduction in the tree population. The principle herbs are grasses (which you mentioned) and sedges (Cyperaceae) and daisy-like plants (Artemisia). The sedges typically like a moist climate (around the shore of the maar?), Artemisa lgenerally ike a dry to semi-dry habitat.

The region remained coated in a cool temperate flora. I envisage a more open forest, not a tundra, which apparently characterizes more "typical" YD assemblages, and certainly not a completely dry lake. I note there is no mention of Dryas itself, which is a point in your favour.

Also in your favour is the visual impression of the core through the Dryas section. I could be wrong, but the darker varves of the YD might have a higher organic content in the winter portion of the varve cycles. Some of that colour could, of course, be mineral matter (perhaps worn from the flanking tephra to the diatreme/maar?? If there is a significant organic component, it suggests greater organic productivity, perhaps a milder climate.

One more thought, the Eifel at 50degS is about mid-way between Scandinavia and the Alps, the two nearest glaciation centres. I don't think anyone has (or can) determined the extent of ice fields during the YD (other than the discredited association with Lake Agassiz). In that midway position, the influence of permanent ice sheets could have been minimal and the vegetation not changed unduly.

I hope these thoughts might be of interest.

Bryn
_________________
All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players.
They have their exits and their entrances,
And one man in his time plays many parts,
His acts being seven ages.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andre



Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 298
Location: Germany - The Nederlands

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks, Bryn.

A few notes.

The pollen count is the second from the right showing a dramatic reduction of all pollen. The other appear to be percentage's (when filled in black) or promilles (when not filled in). So for Pinus and Betula, in the Younger Dryas, both the percentage dropped and the total, but visually this effect is reduced. Should they have used absolute numbers then thedrop would be much more significant.

Then again, if you would run "dryer than before and after" against the pollen, it is consistent indeed with mix of an open forest and steppe and marshy conditions around the lake.

However if you would run "colder than before and after", you would have problems explaining the presence of Ephedra, Quercus, Helianthemun and Sanguisorba and indeed the absence of Empetrum and Dryas, which uses to be abundant in nordic pollen assemblages.

Please stay tuned indeed. I'd appreciate comment on exhibit #3 South Greenland. Furthermore I hope to zoom in on glaciations tomorrow.
_________________
Moderator of http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/climatesceptics/

"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."

Charley Brown
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bryn Thomas



Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you Andre
I should have looked at the significance of the other floral groups.

We both note the lack of Dryas itself. I think we are both viewing this as a 'warmer than' circumstance. This is where the geographic locations of the sample sites become significant. Is it valid to correlate events in the Eifel with a temperature gradient in Greenland?

But I await further installments with great interest. You are tackling a problematic period of time that has great significance globally.

Bryn
_________________
All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players.
They have their exits and their entrances,
And one man in his time plays many parts,
His acts being seven ages.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andre



Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 298
Location: Germany - The Nederlands

PostPosted: Sat Jul 28, 2007 9:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bryn Thomas wrote:
Thank you Andre
I should have looked at the significance of the other floral groups.

We both note the lack of Dryas itself. I think we are both viewing this as a 'warmer than' circumstance. This is where the geographic locations of the sample sites become significant. Is it valid to correlate events in the Eifel with a temperature gradient in Greenland?


But what exactly is true, about the alleged temperature gradient of Greenland, please do see Exhibit #3

Quote:
But I await further installments with great interest. You are tackling a problematic period of time that has great significance globally.

Bryn


Well so far we are on track, with Exhibit #4
_________________
Moderator of http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/climatesceptics/

"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."

Charley Brown
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mk



Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:57 am    Post subject: Re: Exhibit #1 The Younger Dryas and the Meerfelder maar Reply with quote

Andre wrote:
the water explosive evaporating, leaving deep craters, which fill up with water, the
"maars".

I do not understand what this means. Evaporating very quickly, or with the volcanic eruptions?

What techniques are used to count and differentiate one pollen from another pollen at each data point? How accurate and reliable are these methods?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Andre



Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 298
Location: Germany - The Nederlands

PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 8:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Exhibit #1 The Younger Dryas and the Meerfelder maar Reply with quote

Mk wrote:
Andre wrote:
the water explosive evaporating, leaving deep craters, which fill up with water, the
"maars".

I do not understand what this means. Evaporating very quickly, or with the volcanic eruptions?


The idea is that the magma wells up until it get in contact with the wet soil sediments. This will superheat the water. The weight of the soil above it, prevents boiling though. Only the pressure is increasing like in a pressure cooker. As the heating continues at a certain point the soil above it will break up, releasing the pressure, this will cause the superheated water to flash evaporate, basically creating a gigantic explosion.



Quote:
What techniques are used to count and differentiate one pollen from another pollen at each data point? How accurate and reliable are these methods?


Now you got me, that's the work of specialists. Never done that. I suppose they use electron microscopes to identify the indivual pollen:



example
_________________
Moderator of http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/climatesceptics/

"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."

Charley Brown
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mk



Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 9:29 pm    Post subject: Re: Exhibit #1 The Younger Dryas and the Meerfelder maar Reply with quote

Andre wrote:
Mk wrote:
What techniques are used to count and differentiate one pollen from another pollen at each data point? How accurate and reliable are these methods?


Now you got me, that's the work of specialists. Never done that. I suppose they use electron microscopes to identify the indivual pollen:
example

That does seem a little unreliable, Andre. Humans looking and writing down what pollen they can identify. It doesn't seem like a biologist taking animal populations in a zoo—these are varves! Really old smashed up tiny little particles layered on top of each other over years and years and years and years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Andre



Joined: 21 Jul 2007
Posts: 298
Location: Germany - The Nederlands

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:32 am    Post subject: Re: Exhibit #1 The Younger Dryas and the Meerfelder maar Reply with quote

Mk wrote:

That does seem a little unreliable, Andre. Humans looking and writing down what pollen they can identify. It doesn't seem like a biologist taking animal populations in a zoo—these are varves! Really old smashed up tiny little particles layered on top of each other over years and years and years and years.


Well there is always a error margin of course. You see quite often that individual species within a genus or taxus are not recognised. Gramininae, grasses for instance comprises hundreds of species. I guess we have to live with that. I don't think there is so much a problem of not recognized pollen. it doesn't seem to degenerate. Also the researchers must have some sense of error. There is also the possibility of foreign pollen brought by birds or storms. What is ful proof indeed, Therefore it's important to compare and cross check proxies.



_________________
Moderator of http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/climatesceptics/

"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."

Charley Brown
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Earth Sciences Forum Forum Index -> Atmosphere, Ocean, and Climate -> Younger Dryas Exhibits All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
Wordpress Themes|DJ Store|Insurance Articles Directory